<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyShark BlogCenter &#187; malibu sold homes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/tag/malibu-sold-homes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports</link>
	<description>Market Reports for Real Estate Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Malibu, California: Steady number of sales, but decrease in median sale price</title>
		<link>http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/2010/02/03/malibu-california-steady-number-of-sales-but-decrease-in-median-sale-price/</link>
		<comments>http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/2010/02/03/malibu-california-steady-number-of-sales-but-decrease-in-median-sale-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malibu sold homes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this PropertyShark study that was first covered in the Los Angeles Times, we see that the number of sold homes remained steady in Malibu for 2009 (148 sold homes*) when compared to 2008 (145 sold homes). However, it&#8217;s still a significant drop from the peak years in 2005 (275 sold homes) and 2007 (240 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this PropertyShark study that was first covered in the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/02/malibu-home-sales-stayed-steady-in-2009-but-prices-took-a-tumble.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/latimesblogs.latimes.com');">Los Angeles Times</a>, we see that the number of sold homes remained steady in Malibu for 2009 (148 sold homes*) when compared to 2008 (145 sold homes). However, it&#8217;s still a significant drop from the peak years in 2005 (275 sold homes) and 2007 (240 sold homes). The median sale price dropped from $2,660,000 in 2007 and $2,700,000 in 2008 to $1,800,000.</p>
<p>Among the most expensive homes sold in 2009 were a $17.5 million sale for a duplex at <a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/mason/Reports2/showsection.html?propkey=16591757">20018 Sea Lane Drive</a>, a $16.5 million sale at <a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/mason/Reports2/showsection.html?propkey=16592044">6483 Zumirez Drive</a>, and a $14.6 million sale for <a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/mason/Reports2/showsection.html?propkey=16592148">28830 Cliffside Drive</a>. 28830 Cliffside Drive was originally put up for sale in 2007 by <span style="font-size: 100%;">Michael and Lisa </span><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" style="font-size: 100%;"><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Weithorn for $19,250,000, reports <a href="http://realestalker.blogspot.com/2007/06/michael-weithorn-cashing-out-of-malibu.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/realestalker.blogspot.com');">the Real Estalker</a> in a June 2007 article.</span></span><span style="font-size: 100%;"> Property records show the buyer of the estate to be Carl Daikeler.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%;">For a visual presentation of the homes sold  we have put together an interactive map that plots every home sold in 2009. Click on a point of interest for sale price and sale date, as well as links to additional details on the sold property.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/mason/Maps/?map=la&amp;x=0.1624&amp;y=0.7006666666666667&amp;zoom=1&amp;basemap=default&amp;poi=poi-la-rfs-malibu-soldhomesin2009&amp;tab=themes&amp;ll=34.0098419390136,-118.786833188233" title="Malibu Home Sales Map"><span style="font-size: 100%;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1261" title="Malibu-Sales" src="http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Malibu-Sales1.jpg" alt="Malibu-Sales" width="638" height="412" /></span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%;">Note: for the purpose of this report we have defined sold homes as single-family residences &amp; duplexes.<br />
</span></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/2010/02/03/malibu-california-steady-number-of-sales-but-decrease-in-median-sale-price/" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p><div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Malibu%2C+California%3A+Steady+number+of+sales%2C+but+decrease+in+median+sale+price+http%3A%2F%2Fpropertyshark.com%2FReal-Estate-Reports%2F%3Fp%3D1252" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Malibu%2C+California%3A+Steady+number+of+sales%2C+but+decrease+in+median+sale+price+http%3A%2F%2Fpropertyshark.com%2FReal-Estate-Reports%2F%3Fp%3D1252" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.propertyshark.com/Real-Estate-Reports/2010/02/03/malibu-california-steady-number-of-sales-but-decrease-in-median-sale-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

